who is responsible  posté le mardi 21 février 2012 07:28

Furniture 200000 yuan" wounded", who is responsible?
And move the company signed a contract 200000 yuan worth of furniture shipped to Shanghai moving company designated address, but require consumers to Ms. Lee to 50 km outside the warehouse delivery. Transporting furniture home,company formation consumers found the furniture has been damaged, but the handling company refused to compensate. On the 20 day, Ms. Li complaints to Licang branch of Yongqing Road Office of industry and commerce.
On the 15 day, people Ms. Lee Licang commissioned a moving company to a value of 200000 yuan of solid wood furniture shipped to Shanghai, the two sides signed the contract agreement, the delivery destination for Lee's daughter in the family, a total cost of 3800 yuan, Qingdao after loading prepaid 1900 yuan, after arriving at the destination and then pay 1900 yuan. Such as during transportation damage, moving company according to the market price for the compensation, but Lee did not give the furniture to buy insurance. The 18 day has arrived in Shanghai, Ms. Lee received a moving company phone, called the furniture has been shipped to Shanghai,singapore company formation but to the 50 km outside the warehouse replenishment. Because of furniture external packaging intact, Ms. Lee pickup spot sign, but our furniture to home only to find that all the furniture," wounded", table, bed and wardrobe, have varying degrees of rubbing marks. Ms. Lee immediately contacted the moving company, for $200000, but the moving company is called abrasions may appear in the furniture from the warehouse transported home link, and refused to Ms. Lee claims. Both the multiple coordination fail, 20, Ms. Lee through the phone to complain to Licang branch of Yongqing Road Office of industry and commerce.
In the course of the investigation, the moving company staff said, put the furniture to the destination, how to knock on the door did not open, had to go back to the warehouse, furniture damage may occur in the Ms. Lee furniture shipped home on the way, they have done to the provisions of the contract obligations, should not bear all the responsibility. But Li does not recognize the moving company statement, called the 18 days she at home all day, never heard a knock on the door, moving the company 's contract in accordance with the requirements of the furniture to destination default first, she got the furniture from the warehouse to the home, took place without Kepeng phenomenon.
Industrial and commercial personnel thinks, at present, it is difficult to define furniture damage appears in the which part. In the process of mediation, Lee insisted on moving company moving company to pay 200000 yuan,Furniture industry performance but insists that he is not responsible. At present, Ms. Lee is considering taking legal action against the moving company.

partager

Déposez un commentaire !

(facultatif)

(facultatif)

error

Attention, les propos injurieux, racistes, etc. sont interdits sur ce site.
Si une personne porte plainte, nous utiliserons votre adresse internet (38.107.179.214) pour vous identifier.     

Aucun commentaire pour l'article:
who is responsible


ouvrir la barre
fermer la barre

Vous devez être connecté pour écrire un message à mademm

Vous devez être connecté pour ajouter mademm à vos amis

 
Créer un blog